Our trial lawyers have been winning cases for companies and people engaged in business for over forty years. Our success comes from having seasoned lawyers who listen to their clients, apply creative and case-specific strategies to cases, and have the experience to know what matters most.
Our lawyers are passionate about putting our clients’ needs first and solving problems. We take pride in providing true value for every client in every case.
The depth and breadth of our experience allows us to take on large and complex cases across the broad spectrum of business disputes. We litigate in federal and state trial and appellate courts and in private arbitration forums. We prepare every case to go to trial, knowing that favorable settlements depend on being trial-ready.
We litigate all manner of cases involving business, including the specialized areas identified in the tabs on this page. For a more detailed description of our expertise in those areas, click the applicable tabs.
- Favorably resolved a trademark and counterfeiting lawsuit we filed on behalf of a Japanese golf club manufacturer. We obtained a permanent injunction on behalf of the client, along with approx. $1 million in monetary payments from the other side. Early on in the action, we got the other side’s cross-claims (seeking $110,000 per month in damages) dismissed via an anti-SLAPP motion, and we received an award whereby the other side was required to pay all of the attorney’s fees and costs incurred by our client in connection with the anti-SLAPP motion.
- Defended leading provider of subscription-based streaming videos against national class actions claiming violation of disability anti-discrimination under ADA and state discrimination statutes relating to Internet-based closed captioning practices.
- Represented Nasdaq-listed commercial pharmaceutical company in parallel internal and SEC investigations into alleged stock price manipulation.
- Represented a live entertainment company in a jury trial in an action by a former officer who sued the company and its chief executive officer for breach of an employment contract.
- Represented a German investment group in connection with a $50 million investment in four motion pictures.
- Represented lender and associated employees and entities against HELOC borrower’s claims in Los Angeles Superior Court for fraud, conspiracy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and injunctive and declaratory relief.
- Representation of media personality Tony Robbins in declaratory relief and bad faith action against media liability insurer obligated to provide defense in connection with third party fraud and RICO action.
- Tried to judgment claim on behalf of subrogee of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company resulting in $1 million non-dischargeable judgment arising out of forgeries of promissory note and trust deed.
- Presented to and advised chief privacy officer and privacy counsel for national broadcaster and affiliates regarding compliance issues and notice requirements for websites and online videos under Video Privacy Protection Act and state equivalents.
- Defended publicly-held live-entertainment company in shareholder action alleging California Corporations Code and securities fraud, breach of fiduciary duty regarding obligations to remove restrictive legends, and failure to provide shareholder dissenters’ rights in a reverse merger.
- Represented an information technology services company in an SEC investigation regarding purported violations of the registration and anti-fraud provision of the federal securities laws.
- Defended securities brokers in arbitration by customers alleging securities fraud in connection with the sale of auction rate securities.
- Represented leading provider of subscription-based streaming videos, defense of national class actions claiming violation of disability anti-discrimination under ADA and state discrimination statutes relating to Internet-based closed captioning practices.
- Represented high-tech manufacturing company in trade secret case brought against former engineer accused of misappropriating blueprints and other proprietary information and designs.
- July 2018: Fewer Remedies in California for Targets of Defamatory Reviews
- May 2018: Courts Wrestle with Coverage of Cyber-Related Claims
- November 2017: How to Handle Salary History When Hiring in California
- November 2017: Cybersecurity Roundtable
- September 2017: California’s Never-Ending Foie Gras Battle, Explained
- September 2017: Foie gras ban in limbo
- August 2017: Groundbreaking cyber insurance decision
- June 2017: Trade secret theft in the digital age
- January 2017: The EU’s New Data Privacy Laws Should Be On Your Radar
- January 2017: California Supreme Court Prohibits “On Call” Rest Breaks for Employees
- January 2015: TroyGould Attorneys Co-Author, Chapter 6, “Derivative Suits and Securities Litigation” of Counseling California Corporations (CEB), 3rd Ed.
- August 2014: Dispute Resolution in California
- August 2014: Litigation and Enforcement in the United States: Overview
- August 2014: CA Supreme Court Firmly Upholds Enforceability of Class Action Waivers, Except For PAGA Representative Claims
- April 2014: New Opportunities for Finding Liability Insurance Coverage in Business Cases
- February 2014: Traditional Insurance Products and Cyber-Liability Claim
- February 2014: Traditional Insurance Products and Cyber Fraud Claims
- February 2014: Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Can Defeat Class Certification
- August 2013: Steep Penalties for Wrongfully Refusing to Defend
- June 2013: U.S. Supreme Court Narrows Another Loophole for Escaping Arbitration
- May 2013: Real Estate Lenders Beware: Merger May Destroy or Diminish the Value of a Lender’s Security
- April 2013: Making Arbitration Provisions In Employment Agreements Cover Statutory Claims
- April 2013: Liability Insurance Coverage For False Advertising Claims
- March 2013: SEC Still Quiet On Rule 144(i) Evergreen Requirement
- March 2013: Supreme Court Makes Securities Fraud Class Certification Easier
- March 2013: Employers Take Note: Additional Leave for Pregnant Employees May be Required
- January 2013: What to Do When Your Company’s Stock is Targeted by Internet Short Sellers
- January 2013: California Supreme Court Weakens Integration Provisions In Contracts
- January 2013: Clarity May Be Coming For Arbitration Provisions in Employment Agreements
- January 2013: New Employment Laws for 2013